RAMOLAD | FEMA HDS WHISTLEBLOWER Celeste Solum | BREAKING NEWS: Havana Syndrome in Public Cognitive Warfare Next? (Newsbreak 143) Feb 21, 2022

Feb 21, 2022: Newsbreak 143 | Celeste Solum | BREAKING NEWS: Havana Syndrome in Public Cognitive Warfare Next?

Explosive information from military sources suggest Havana Syndrome on a large scale may be headed the public’s way, the intention insidious neurodamage as evident in the cases of diplomats and spies apparently caught in a hot war involving many countries, says Celeste Solum.

Government admits breaking privacy law with NHS test and trace | Technology | The Guardian #WeaponizedINTERNET on Innocent Civilians #TargetedIndividuals #Surveillance PROFITS over HUMAN RIGHTS

A woman walks past an advert for the test-and-trace system in London

A woman walks past an advert for the test-and-trace system in London. The government’s admission follows a legal challenge.

Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

The UK government broke the law in rolling out its test-and-trace programme without a full assessment of the privacy implications, the Department of Health and Social Care has admitted after a legal challenge.The Guardian can reveal the programme has already led to three data breaches involving email mishaps and unredacted personal information being shared in training materials.

“The reckless behavior of this government in ignoring a vital and legally required safety step known as the data protection impact assessment (DPIA) has endangered public health,”

…said Jim Killock, the executive director of Open Rights Group (ORG).

“We have a ‘world beating’ unlawful test-and-trace programme.

Source: Government admits breaking privacy law with NHS test and trace | Technology | The Guardian

As the World Turns Its Attention to the #Pandemic, Israel Is Moving Forward with Military Raids By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida |Global Research, March 26, 2020 #CoronaVirus

In-depth Report:

The West Bank situation is becoming increasingly complicated amid the coronavirus pandemic and territorial disputes between Palestinians and Israelis. At first, the Palestinian Authority and Israel showed signs of cooperation in combating the pandemic. A few weeks ago, joint measures were announced between both sides to contain the epidemic of the new coronavirus in the region. The measures include distribution of cleaning and personal hygiene materials, in addition to virus testing kits and medical equipment.

On the part of Tel Aviv, the total closure of the West Bank was promoted, allowing, however, access for Palestinian workers involved in the construction and agriculture sectors to the Jewish state, which is why the proposal was well accepted by Ramallah. On the part of the Palestinians, the West Bank has also been blocked, but only partially and for two weeks, since last Sunday (March 22), in addition to the implementation of a series of control and quarantine measures.

However, efforts to contain the pandemic have not prevented Israeli incursions into the region, which have increased recently. Ibrahim Melhim, a spokesman for the Palestinian Authority, acknowledged Israeli efforts to contain the coronavirus in the country and in Palestine, but criticized the unstoppable incursions against the Palestinians.

“We have very strong round-the-clock coordination with the Israeli side to prevent the coronavirus from spreading (…) At the same time, Israel continues to operate in the Palestinian Territories as if there is no coronavirus crisis (…) They [Israeli forces] continue their raids across the West Bank, arresting people and confiscating lands, and that harms the existing coordination between the PA and Israel putting an additional burden on the Palestinian Authority,” said the spokesman.

Apparently, Israel pretends to collaborate with Palestine to stop the pandemic, when, in fact, it freely promotes its military maneuvers in the region, which go unnoticed by the mainstream media, strongly focused on covering the viral tragedy. In addition, Tel Aviv’s own collaboration to control COVID-19 in the region seems extremely limited. The blocking measures made it impossible, for example, for doctors from the “Physicians for Human Rights” (an Israeli NGO that serves Palestinians free of charge) to move alongside the West Bank, clearly hampering medical care in the region.

Mention should also be made of the fact that Israel, not Palestine, is the major focus of infections by the new coronavirus in the region. Israel has already more than 1.000 officially reported cases of the disease, in addition to one death, and several suspicions. In contrast, Palestine has around 60 infected people. It is clear from these data that the most stringent containment measures should come exclusively from Ramallah, since the Israeli military presence in the region itself poses a serious risk to Palestinian public health.

According to a survey by the Truman Institute for Peace at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 63% of Israelis say Israel must help Palestinians during the coronavirus crisis. Vered Vinitsky-Serousse, president of the Institute, said that

“the majority of Israelis believe that, when necessary, the government should devise preventive measures to help Palestinians during the Covid-19 epidemic.”

The big problem, however, is how these joint maneuvers are conducted. Perhaps the first step to be taken in establishing joint measures is the definitive and immediate end to military incursions in the region, which constantly bring insecurity and terror to the Palestinian people.

The situation of tensions in the region must still be read in the context of the so-called “Deal of the Century”, the “peace” proposal for the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians announced by American President Donald Trump. The “agreement” was celebrated unilaterally by the Washigton-Tel Aviv axis, with no participation of Palestinians, which is why it was rejected by the Palestinian Authority and the Arab League. The document foresaw the annexation of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, leaving around 70% of the region under Palestinian rule – a figure much lower than that proposed by all previous attempts to resolve the conflict. Everything indicates that Israel will not stop its attempts to occupy that territory as much as possible.

It is in this context that the “joint” actions between Israelis and Palestinians must be analyzed with skepticism and suspicion. Are these pandemic containment measures really good, even when behind them the Israeli army expands its occupation in the region with increasingly aggressive incursions? Also, to what extent does Palestine benefit from the help of these joint actions when Israel has an absurdly greater number of infected people? Would Israel be able to help the Palestinians? Or would that aid be a mask for such military incursions? All of these are valid questions.

It is also worth remembering that a few weeks ago, at the end of February, Israel announced the construction of more than 2.000 new settlements in Palestinian territories – and on the same occasion, Netanyahu authorized the construction of other 7.000 units in the East Jerusalem region. These data mean that Israel’s aggressiveness against the Palestinians was increasing recently. Did this aggression really disappear from Tel Aviv’s plans in the face of a “commotion” with public health in Palestine (which is much better than the situation in Israel)? Perhaps, the mainstream media and Human Rights observers should divide their attention between the coronavirus and the conflict in Palestine, before more serious clashes erupt.

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

This article was originally published on InfoBrics.

Lucas Leiroz is a research fellow in international law at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

Featured image is from InfoBrics

5G Super-Hotspots will effectively function as kill zones Barrie TROWER

5G Super-Hotspots will effectively function as kill zones by former MI6 BARRIE TROWER of the UK

Which brings us to the single most perilous aspect of the military deployment of 5G—KILL ZONES. These are Weapons on a military level… now, what happened in China, NY Spain, Italy etc.

Royal Navy veteran Barrie Trower with extensive knowledge on microwave warfare on the people of earth. He talks about 5G & the Dangers

 

MILITARY INTEL REPORT Proves Government Has Known 5G Radio-frequency Ranges & Microwave Radiation Are Harmful to Human Health

“Not only has the U.S. Military scientifically documented the adverse health effects associated with 5G (as well as 4G and 3G), there is now hard evidence that proves the U.S. Federal Government has knowingly lied about those numerous health hazards for decades.”  As follows:

Hard evidence proves US gov’t lied about 5G. Navy research report confirms numerous health dangers.

Which brings us to the single most perilous aspect of the military deployment of 5G—KILL ZONES.

All the scientific evidence available in the public domain now indicates that wherever 5G infrastructure is located in the greatest concentration generating the most powerful EMF and microwaves, those  5G Super-Hotspots will effectively function as kill zones.  As follows:

5G Super-Hotspots: You better know where the “kill zones” are located!

In order to fully grasp the highly destructive and deadly potential of these rapidly emerging  5G Super-Hotspots, the following video exposé presents a scenario where the most powerful “directed energy weapons” will be located within these 5G kill zones.

5G WEAPONRY: Microwave Radiation Technology Being Deployed as Depopulation Warfare, Full Spectrum Dominance & Total Human Control (Video)

Sources:

 

Tyrannical Noose Tightening Around our US Necks: America in Turmoil

Norman Solomon
November 26, 2019 11:00AM (UTC)
Last week, the Democratic leadership put an extension of the Patriot Act into a “continuing resolution” that averted a government shutdown. More than 95 percent of the Democrats in the House went along with it by voting for the resolution. Both co-chairs of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Reps. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., and Mark Pocan, D-Wis., voted yes. So did all 11 of the CPC’s vice chairs.

This article originally appeared at Common Dreams. It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

It didn’t have to be that way. House progressives could have thrown a monkey wrench into the Orwellian machinery. Instead, the cave-in was another bow to normalizing the U.S. government’s mass surveillance powers.

“There’s no other way to spin this,” a progressive staffer on Capitol Hill told The New Republic. “This was a major capitulation. The Progressive Caucus has touted itself as an organization that can wield power and leverage the votes of its 90 members. And they didn’t lift a finger. Democratic leadership rammed this down their throats.”

A gag reflex was needed from progressive lawmakers, who should have put up a fight rather than swallow rationales for going along with Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s maneuver. With the Fourth Amendment on life support, basic civil liberties were at stake.

There were opportunities to push back — if CPC leaders had moved to throw down a gauntlet.

“You could go through and name any strategy for me, and I would tell you why it would fail,” Jayapal said. But if you don’t put up a fight, you’re sure to fail. And showing some strength on a matter of principle can build momentum while marshaling grassroots support in the process.

With a show of resolve, just a few dozen Democrats could have blocked the resolution. Instead, it passed the House on Nov. 19 by a 231-192 margin, thus extending the Patriot Act for three months instead of letting it expire.

“No” votes came from all four members of “the Squad” — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley and Rashida Tlaib.

The list of “yes” votes from House members with progressive reputations was stunningly long. Here are just a dozen: Karen Bass, Raúl Grijalva, Ro Khanna, Barbara Lee, Zoe Lofgren, Jim McGovern, Jerrold Nadler, Chellie Pingree, Jamie Raskin, Jan Schakowsky, Maxine Waters and Peter Welch.

One factor: Even the best progressives in the House spend a lot more time with congressional colleagues and leaders than they do with constituents. Call it an occupational hazard. Peer pressure and conformity tend to be cumulative. The power of the Democratic leadership is quite tangible and often stern, whereas the power of constituents is routinely diffuse and unrealized.

To the extent that progressives at the grassroots don’t effectively pressure members of Congress, party authorities like Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer maintain a tremendous advantage. To the extent that avoiding conflict with the Democratic leadership is more important than standing up for principles, even the best progressive incumbents succumb to the Capitol bubble. Given the strength of that bubble, it can only be burst with methodical intervention from the grassroots.

Pocan was on target when he commented a year ago: “People in D.C. think we’re the center of the universe, but we’re not — the people who elect us are the center of the universe. It’s when you have that kind of activism in the districts, you’re really going to be impactful.”

In the case of the Patriot Act-laden continuing resolution, which President Trump signed into law shortly after passage, the contrasts between avowed commitments and conformist acquiescence were striking among many progressive luminaries in the House. A few examples:

  • In his first House race, when he unsuccessfully challenged incumbent Rep. Tom Lantos in 2004, Khanna was emphatic in his opposition to the Patriot Act. He declared: “We have a chance to do something absolutely extraordinary in this election: to hold a congressman responsible based on his voting record. Mr. Lantos has had a distinguished career in public service, but his votes for the war and the Patriot Act don’t represent the will of this district.”
  • Lee has been denouncing the Patriot Act for the better part of two decades, as when in 2005 she issued a news release headlined “Barbara Lee Opposes Extension of the Patriot Act, Blasts ‘Big Brother Attack.’
  • In 2015, Lofgren minced no words in opposing even a brief Patriot Act extension. She signed a letter with five colleagues that stated: “We will not vote to reauthorize this program, even for a short period of time.”
  • In autumn 2016, just before she won election to Congress for the first time, Jayapal told an interviewer “why I stepped up to fight back against the Bush administration, against the Patriot Act, against civil-liberties violations. It was very, very personal, in a way, but it was also very political. It was not just about me. It was, ‘Wait a second. We as a country cannot undermine the deepest values that make us who we are.’”

It’s telling that Khanna, Lee, Lofgren and Jayapal — and so many other self-identified progressives in the House — chose to take the path of least resistance last week when faced with a choice of whether to buck their party’s leadership or facilitate the extension of the Patriot Act that they have long opposed. Heightening the sad irony is the fact that the newly reauthorized provisions have enabled far more aggressive surveillance than was envisioned when the Patriot Act first passed — at which time Lee, McGovern, Nadler, Schakowsky, Waters and others who just voted for the reauthorization felt compelled to oppose it.

Last week, they followed leadership that was determined to merge the odious act with the continuing resolution. An amendment, offered by independent Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, would have separated the Patriot Act extension from the resolution — but the House Rules Committee (chaired by McGovern), in step with Pelosi’s marching orders, killed that amendment.

If even 20 more House progressives had signaled a willingness to vote against the continuing resolution unless it was separated from Patriot Act reauthorization, they would have been in a strong position to demand standalone votes on each measure. That would have underscored serious opposition to the Act’s surveillance programs — enhancing progressive leverage in the House and increasing the chances of reform when the issue of further Patriot Act extension comes back to Congress in a few months.

Instead, leading progressive lawmakers chose to sidestep a historic opportunity to do the right thing by registering clear opposition to the Patriot Act. Such retreats end up eroding rather than building the power of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Rolling back key aspects of the military-industrial-surveillance complex cannot be accomplished without putting up a huge fight. Postponing confrontations with party leaders might seem prudent, but such caution has negative consequences. Sooner or later, grassroots activists become exasperated when Democrats in Congress don’t match progressive statements with actions. Just being a member of the Progressive Caucus is not enough.

 

Progressives in Congress just capitulated on the Patriot Act — it’s time to push back | Salon.com
https://www.salon.com/2019/11/26/progressives-in-congress-just-capitulated-on-the-patriot-act-its-time-to-push-back/

“The problem isn’t data protection, it’s data collection.” – NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden

.@Snowden “What do you do when the most powerful institutions in society have become the least accountable to society?

That’s the question our generation exists to answer.”

 

What Shut Down? NSA #Surveillance #SKYNET #AI #CLOUDCOMPUTING #MILITARIZED #POLICESTATE #ORWELLIAN #DEPOPULATION

According to Nafeez Ahmed, of INSURGE intelligence, a crowdfunded adversarial investigations into power, to empower people and save our planet…. the NSA upped their unConstitutional game against our very right to live in a free save and open environment. Yesterday, I was so heavily #gangstalked by their AI SKYNET DARPA team, various pick-up drivers swerved into my lane on a busy highway, several times… endangering my life, as if I was some sort of prisoner (of surveillance, psyops, torture, experimentation’s that are horrendous) and I’d went too far from prison grounds.

INSURGE intelligence continues… (A must read) one of the best along with the INTERCEPT…

“…the NSA’s shut down of this particular program did not imply an end to domestic phone record surveillance, but quite the opposite — that the program had been superseded by superior technology.

According to Russ Tice, a former senior NSA intelligence analyst who had previously worked with the US Air Force, Office of Naval Intelligence and Defense Intelligence Agency, the latest claim that the NSA was rolling up phone surveillance beggared belief.”

There is much more… if you cherish freedom and your very life, consider following them and read over their articles and support them. We’re running gout of heroes. — Lissa HumaneLife (Chris / Huggybear)

Just as Edward Snowden delcares after the above story hit the New York Times, and I agree, that:

So, WHAT SHUT DOWN?  see it ramping up when I’m literally almost run off the road dangerously on a busy four lane highway coming home from passed on family friends…. it was then I realized that its as if I’m a dog with a zap collar and I roamed too far from the prison grounds. Watch me go again, today! Lissa Humane Life (Better fight for your freedoms now, or they’ll be none and welcome to ORWELL.

When the NYT story broke, I reached out to two former senior NSA officials, Russ Tice and Thomas Drake, to find out what they thought.

Both of them told me that the NSA’s shut down of this particular program did not imply an end to domestic phone record surveillance, but quite the opposite — that the program had been superseded by superior technology.

According to Russ Tice, a former senior NSA intelligence analyst who had previously worked with the US Air Force, Office of Naval Intelligence and Defense Intelligence Agency, the latest claim that the NSA was rolling up phone surveillance beggared belief.

The NSA didn’t stop surveillance, they ramped it up and just moved some pieces around… can’t believe anything they say.

As the INSURGE writes:
“If anything, they no longer need this particular program to parse the card catalog — meta data — and can mine the content data directly with enhanced algorithms and processing and strapping. And when there is no pushback capability, congress is at the mercy of NSA to inform them on NSA’s abuses.”

READ MORE HERE:

Whistleblowers say NSA still spies on American phones in hidden program
https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/whistleblowers-say-nsa-still-spies-on-american-phones-under-hidden-program-3aeaf457cd1f

#Gangstalking #AI #MACHINE #Quantum Computer #Matrix #CellTowers/Phones #SmartGrid #Synchronization #Surveillance #TargetedIndividual #TargetedToo

Example One — This is what #TIs go thru on a daily bases. The Artificial Intelligence that’s in the literal air in a Sentient Worldwide Simulation created for the NSA — it’s why the collected all the date on everyone, in particular, Americans. This is highly advanced technological weaponization of surveillance before your eyes going on in your neighborhoods across the US and abroad, especially the five eye nations.

Predictive Programming

The EyeOpener- Sentient World Simulation: Meet Your DoD Clone –

Lissa

Below video is from a whistleblower, former Amazon security insider and DARPA (CERN/DWAVE) synchronization of humanity; yes, Amazon has made billions on US taxpayers to SURVEIL everything we do – See Wikileaks ‘On the Take and lovingvb  it.’ and his last video when they pulled it/him off air talking about the Nanites in the air.

To understand what’s going on… think of the Matrix, a simulation, synthetic from Chemtrail spraying and the electronic grid via smartphones to the cell towers to a black box that goes to Ft. Meade, MD and from there to the NSA’s Utah facility where all of our data goes in a literal second of time… to super computers that communicate with computers that work in the air–the ether… quantum computers. It’s heavy physics but its what’s going on.

DARPA AVATAR PROJECT LINKS YOUR MIND TO A DIGITAL WORLD INSIDE A QUANTUM COMPUTER

Read over some of the informative links provide below. You can email me with questions or leave a response.

HERE”s the CLINCHER-– TIs are REAL inside this REEL. Whereas everyone else are BACKDROPS – they’re minds are COPIES of the actual real brain in their super computer, for complete CONTROL – hence perps, neighbors and everyone else. Its not them.  CIA DOD DARPA is your perpetrators controlling situations in the simulation. Unlike everyone else, we stood up to them over finances and politics, whistleblew, dissented became activists after they did us horridly wrong –the rest are asleep. We did the right thing.. we get it.  We see injustice and go by the law, hence to make us look lawless, corrupted. Most TIs hold PhDs, Bachelor degrees, etc. Yet fail to see the skits, the simulation run by the NSA and CIA and DOD (DARPA).

Once you understand their keys to this matrix, you become very dangerous to them.

Another Example: — the only thing you’re not seeing is the matrix before your eyes. Logic has left the room. Grab it back and your self-awareness. Step back from your story–how you got on the list and see the bigger picture–this is run by highly advanced cloud-computing smart grid synthetics (Chemtrails) super quantum computers — the NSA is running a worldwide ‘simulation.’

Learn more of gangstalking really is — its a simulation by the NSA-CIA & Dept. of Defense and its worldwide.

Manifestation of Chaos & Simulation Theory – YouTube —

Sentient World Simulation Archives | Take The RedPill! — https://www.redpillinfowar.com/category/sentient-world-simulation/.

Synthetic Environment for Analysis and Simulations – Wikipedia — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_Environment_for_Analysis_and_Simulations?fbclid=IwAR3jhkraSWjbvhux9SeYBpQ3cN2W2sBln45F53KFcMLM1R5N72iwLgMWRyg#Sentient_World_Simulation.

What you need to know about the SENTIENT WORLD SIMULATION and VIRTUAL REALITY – YouTube

The Matrix all around us — testing highly advanced artificial intelligent run quantum to the cubic computers–they wanted complete control, the Internet of all things. Dr. Robert Duncan worked on these targeting technologies to control humanity, regrettably compartmentalized unknowingly… he learned that his work was for targeting and spoke out and was targeted for doing so. He whistle blew on Jesse Ventura’s show, Brain Invaders on Conspiracy Theory.

  • Gerald Clark – Former DARPA employee – How to Break Out of the Matrix – Meat Modem – YouTube

Video 119: The Grid and how to Exit the Matrix

 

National Security #PatriotAct & Your Once Private Medical Information #TargetedIndividuals & those who assume they’re not #Targetedtoo

The Patriot Act and Medical Records

Section 215 of the Patriot Act gives high-ranking FBI officials (the Director, Deputy Director, or Executive Assistant Director for National Security) the authority to obtain foreign intelligence information using a court order to compel production of medical records. This provision is largely redundant because the FBI probably already had permissive access to medical records under HIPAA’s national security exemption, but the powers granted under Section 215 are broader and more secretive.

Unlike the HIPAA exemption, however, a Section 215 disclosure is mandatory or compelled.

This gives an agency like the FBI that can use both sets of rules—HIPAA and the Patriot Act—alternatives. It can ask a HIPAA-covered entity for medical records, which can be turned over without a patient’s authorization under the national security exemption. Or, the FBI can apply to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the secret court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, to compel production “of any tangible things (including books, records, papers, documents, and other items) for an investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities, provided that such investigation of a United States person is not conducted solely upon the basis of activities protected by the first amendment to the Constitution.”

Can you find out if your medical records have been disclosed under a HIPAA exemption or the Patriot Act? Theoretically, you could under HIPAA, which entitles patients to an “accounting of disclosures“; that is, the right to know to whom their medical information has been disclosed for up to six years prior to a request, for reasons other than treatment, payment, or routine business operations.3 Since national security disclosures are not expressly omitted from the list, covered entities should as a matter of law have to account for them if a patient asks. In contrast, the Patriot Act expressly bans anyone ordered to hand over “tangible things”—like records—from telling anyone who isn’t necessary to producing the “tangible things.”4 This means a patient may never know if her medical information is sought using the Patriot Act, even if she does request and receive an accounting of disclosures.

https://www.eff.org/issues/national-security-and-medical-information

EFF Comments on Proposed Rulemaking: Human Subjects Research Protections

https://www.eff.org/files/2016/01/07/eff_common_rule_nprm_comment.pdfhttps://www.eff.org/files/2016/01/07/eff_common_rule_nprm_comment.pdfhttps://www.eff.org/files/2016/01/07/eff_common_rule_nprm_comment.pdf

MKULTRA, The CIA’s Program of Research in Behavioral Modification: Joint Hearing of Select Comm. on Intelligence and Subcomm. on Health and Sci. Research of S. Comm. on Human Resources, 96th Cong. 69 – 72 (1977) (Appendix A),
see also
Memorandum from John C. Yoo, Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Dep’t of Justice to William J.
Haynes II, General Counsel of the Department of Defense, Re: Military Interrogation of Alien Unlawful Combatants Held Outside the United States, (Mar. 14, 2003),
.

Under an Ionized Sky: Elana Freeland PDF (Excerpts) #Nanoparticles #Nanosensors #Metals

ukyu
Excerpts:
Along with conductive metal nanoparticles, trillions of nano-sensors and microprocessors have been and continue to be released into the stratosphere and troposphere via jets, drones, ships, and rockets.
In short, our atmosphere is no longer conducting natural charge, current, and voltage.
Instead, we are now breathing from a ramped-up amplifier / condenser / antenna built of conductive nano-metals and ionized electrons. Tiny and almost weightless for maximum long-lasting loft, metal nanoparticles offer multiplied surface area and attract moisture for generating storms. Besides attaching to and ionizing molecules of oxygen, those in the upper atmosphere bond with and draw unknown organisms down into our atmosphere, creating chemical synergies our immune systems know nothing about. Yet we are forced to breathe this chemical witches’ brew while the nanoparticles (including “smart dust” and “dusty plasma”) breach our blood-brain barrier.
Thus it is no longer only the unseen world of wireless radio waves and microwaves pulsing through our bodies and brains that we must take into account but nano-synergies that our Earth and immune systems are so far ill-equipped to handle.
The military-industrial-intelligence complex gave the green light to nanotechnology more than twenty years ago, about the time that jets began spewing nano-metals. Nano-scale materials, tools and devices now exceed profits of $1 trillion per year.
The nano-revolution—like the non-ionized radiation revolution—occurred very quietly so as to avoid public attention and government safety trials and standards. Owning the weather was the overarching military-industrial-intelligence objective, not health. Nor was it the first time that the biosphere had to serve as collateral damage for open field “research” under Section 1520a Chapter 32 of U.S. Code Title 50, “Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents”:
Title 50 defines the role of war and national defense, and Chapter 32 sets limits on chemical and biological warfare programs.
While the Secretary of Defense may not conduct any chemical or biological experiments on civilian populations, the loophole lies in allowing for medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, and industrial research and tests, including research for protection against weapons and for law enforcement purposes like riot control.
Read much more from Elana Freeland’s free PDF, downloadable: “Under an Ionized Sky.”